Module: check_mk
Branch: master
Commit: da82ab8d57cfcb6e89787dcde19529962bf56c43
URL:
http://git.mathias-kettner.de/git/?p=check_mk.git;a=commit;h=da82ab8d57cfcb…
Author: Mathias Kettner <mk(a)mathias-kettner.de>
Date: Fri Jan 20 14:29:09 2012 +0100
Updated bug entries #0602, #0575
---
.bugs/575 | 15 +++++++++++++--
.bugs/602 | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.bugs/575 b/.bugs/575
index 4539889..09ee9b0 100644
--- a/.bugs/575
+++ b/.bugs/575
@@ -6,5 +6,16 @@ Targetversion: 1.2.0
Class: nastiness
This will be an unloved request...
-We will need an option to undo a change that has been "clicked" but is still
waiting for activation.
-In a larger setup there could be 20 pending changes because the admin(s) will try to
match nagios downtimes for activation or some other se. on the other hand right now you
need to COMMIT a change into the live configuration to UNDO it - even if you already
noticed it was erronoeous. (Ja, ich kann heute nicht tippen)
+
+We will need an option to undo a change that has been "clicked" but is still
+waiting for activation. In a larger setup there could be 20 pending changes
+because the admin(s) will try to match nagios downtimes for activation
+or some other se. on the other hand right now you need to COMMIT a change
+into the live configuration to UNDO it - even if you already noticed it was
+erronoeous. (Ja, ich kann heute nicht tippen)
+
+WONTFIX: This is impossible to implement. Changes are not stored as files
+ore transactions but are direct modifications to the config files. Also
+changes build are built on previous changes. The only possible thing is
+to make a snapshot and get back to the snapshot later.
+
diff --git a/.bugs/602 b/.bugs/602
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..68a036a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.bugs/602
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+Title: Restoring snapshots does not restore htpasswd
+Component: wato
+State: open
+Date: 2012-01-20 14:28:22
+Targetversion: 1.2.0
+Class: bug
+
+When restoring a snapshot, the etc/htpasswd file should also be restored.
+Or is this already implemented?